As
you may know, ‘Flanby’ is one nickname of France’s Socialist President, based
on a commercial crème caramel pudding thanks to his flacid photo images. Also
nicknamed Noah, by me, thanks to the rainfall records accompanying his arrival
at the Elysee, and continuing, you could also call him ‘Mr Tax anything that
moves.’ He’s doing it and by now nothing is moving, other than backwards: but
he’s still taxing. His pedigree as a Socialist includes the fact that he hates
the rich and hates the Middle Classes, the ‘Bourgoisie’ as they call ’em ’ere.
Pay
attention to what I’m going to tell you. I’m not new to breaking exclusives and
if you want to be on top of French breaking exclusives, join this blog. I made
my name as a scoop writer from South Africa in the 1970’s. No hacking. I
have my methods and I get to sources other people can’t reach.
The
President of France proclaims that he owns no property. According to his
biographical blagues (meaning lies or jests) he rents a modest apartment in the
15th (yuppie arrondissement) with his
“First Umbrella Carrier,” Valerie Rottweiler. His former companion, Segolene
Royal lives elsewhere and his four kids may or may not be renting apartments: we
have no transparency about these arrangements. We know how its done here in France:
the apartments will be owned through companies whose tax status will relieve
the President of any direct connection or even fiscal deductions. It’s legal
but invisible to the masses that vote for socialist representatives.
Here
comes the real, exclusive, dope. Mr “Fatty Flanby, ‘hate the middle classes”,
Hollande’ “owns apartments in two central London buildings. He has not declared
them to the state for public scrutiny, which the rich are obliged to do. But
the government does know that he owns them. It has not yet become public
knowledge. Nor is it likely to do so since the activities of the “top” people
are not usually reported in the media here who collude with the politicians
(even to the point of bedding them and moving into the Elysee Palace) to
conceal the hideous con trick being perpetrated on the average, heavily taxed
individual.
Does
that make him a crook?
Frankly,
yes, but thanks to the French laws of privacy which I commented on today in a
news item to Radio Wales, Cardiff, with reference to the Leveson Enquiry, the
French media do not report matters of such seminal interest to the French
public. Thanks to the political-media collusion, they remain silent about the
financial and sexual aberrations of their political bosses. So, only insiders
know the truth and it will stay that way in France because information about
the secret activities of French politicians, sexual or financial, is suppressed
and does not become visible in the media.
Books
seem to be the way in which confidential information, i.e. scoops, become
visible to public scrutiny. The media will report exclusive news that turns up
in a newly published book. This may not go on. Who knows what new tricks the
high up manipulators of public opinion will resort to next? It’s a pity that
the more open media culture in the UK has not only condoned outright invasion
of privacy for ordinary citizens or celebrities but has concealed historic
sexual abuses now being uncovered.
In
France, privacy laws that apparently allow photos of foreign celebrities (viz
Kate Duchess of Cambridge) in private circumstances, to be published contrary
to the law, (the publishers are fined modestly, but still make a world wide
killing) and yet allow the secret financial manipulations or sexual aberrations
and lies re top politicians (e.g. Dominic Strauss Khan’s sex life or Francois
Hollande’s financial investments) to remain hidden, cannot be to the benefit of
a democratic country.
No comments:
Post a Comment